Makati, NCR, Philippines
Those who are interested to know me, read on… Those who are interested to share a space on my sphere, go on… Those who are ready to embrace me, carry on… Those who’d like to celebrate life with me, let’s get it on…

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Confused...


I admit that my key to an efficient day is a planner. I had an initial doubt that I would get the 2010 Starbucks planner since nagtipid ako lately sa pagkakape but thanks to Dra. Joy who treated the whole Club T for coffee last Sunday she filled my sticker stub and presto, I got my much-coveted planner!

Here's the catch ~ when I arrived this morning in the office, the guard gave me my Christmas present from Maxicare ~ one boxed gift and a desk calendar. Since I already have a desk calendar courtesy of my Mom (Ninenok ko yun nasa bahay Mama! Peace!), I gave the Maxicare desk calendar to Grace instead. Now, time to open the boxed gift and oh my! I got the 2010 Maxicare Executive Planner.

Siyempre fan ako ng Starbucks planner so initially I thought kanino ko kaya ibibigay tong isa? While I was thinking, I flipped on the pages and hmmm, maganda pala si Maxicare planner. Tamang-tamang gamitin ng busy bee like me (echos!). So if I am to use this instead, pano naman itong Starbucks planner? To whom shall I pass it on? Kaso, baka magkatampuhan pa ang friendships kasi maraming nagpapatulong sa akin na kumpletuhin ang stub nila (kala kasi nila laklakero pa rin ako ng kape!). And yes, sayang ang freebies ni Starbucks noh!

So I've decided I'll use the Maxicare planner for my office-to-dos and the Starbucks planner for personal stuff ~ dates (ows!), gimmicks (ows ule!), and initial draft of blog entries. Wish ko lang eh magamit ko silang dalawa ng bunggang bungga!

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Another Reality Show Fiasco?!?

I am a fan of reality shows, be it from the Kapuso or the Kapamilya station. And as expected, I always have my bets, placing my stakes even during the early parts of the competition. I also wrote before that I have a good passing rate in choosing who the winner will be; but just the same, I also have my lapses. What’s more interesting though is that I tend to over-analyze the results, which I always think was a valid scrutiny.


Here comes another…


Today’s booting-out of Sef Cadayona (of the Selecta Cornetto 20-pesos ad) was to me an unfair decision of the people behind Starstruck 5. I honestly feel that now is not yet the time for this multi-talented star-wanna-be to bid the show adieu. My thoughts…


  • It was acceptable that Sef be in the Bottom 3 since the Kiss Flick between him and Rox (forgot her surname) was a bit off, but…
  • The other actors in the Kiss Flicks deserve more boos. Nina Kodaka, Steven (surname forgotten as well), Sarah Labahti (did I spell it correctly?) and Ian Batherson were lame kissers and actors must I say.
  • To me, Enzo Pineda was on the safe side. He did not falter but he also did not stood out in his kiss flick with Sarah.
  • No doubt the good actors were Rocco Nacino, Pierro Vergara, Diva Montelaba and Princess Snell, that’s why they were chosen by no less than Gina Alajar to be paired with Aljur Abrenica and Kris Bernal for the Real-Kiss-Flick challenge.
  • The kiss between Princess and Rocco was really the most passionate; thanks to the expertise of Princess (the flick was really showing how good she is as a kisser). No doubt it got the Viewer’s Choice Award for Best Kiss.
  • Pierro and Diva’s kiss had the most “kilig” factor ~ parang pang high school.
  • It was really clear that Rocco, Pierro, Diva and Princess were the real winners. I had to agree when Rocco and Diva were proclaimed Best Actor and Actress, respectively. Not a single doubt about their performances when paired with Kris and Aljur.
  • But lo and behold, when the Bottom 3 was revealed, the trio was Princess, Rox and Sef!
  • Now, we needed to ask ~ why was Princess there in the Bottom 3? She was chosen by Gina Alajar and was voted by the audience for the Best Kiss. These should have cemented her status on the safe side already (Starstruck’s scoring is 50% Challenge Score and 50% Text Votes, just an FYI). Confusing, right?
  • If Princess was safe (which should really be the case), then who should be on the Bottom 3 instead? Nina or Steven who both lacked the energy during their kiss flick (watching them was like watching a non-rating Koreanovela romance)? Sarah whom Gina Alajar had difficulty directing? Enzo Pineda who has a fan-base already that can give him a solid 50% score on the text votes? OR Ian Batherson whose inclusion on the Bottom 3 again (would be his third time already) means an automatic expulsion from the search?
  • Among the 5, my take would be Ian Batherson. I have nothing against the guy, but I felt he did not deliver a good acting in the kiss flick with Sarah. I also thought he has no solid fan-base to vote for him coz if that is the case then he wouldn’t be in the Bottom 3 twice in a row. Remember his “Ako na yata ang Pinakamagandang Lalake” Music Video? It was commended by its own director and I thought he was really good then, but he still landed a spot on the Bottom 3. That made me ask “Is he getting text votes?”
  • Text votes wise, I think Nina, Steven, Sarah and Enzo have winning edge over Ian. It would be quite impractical for Starstruck 5 to vote out any of these four. More text votes, more income. Right?
  • If it was then Ian in the Bottom 3, an automatic expulsion should have happened. Rox and Sef should have been safe.


Apologies if I again over-analyzed the results of tonight’s Starstruck 5 episode. But for the purpose of impartiality, sticking with the real scores and following the show’s rules, I guess we, the viewers have a BIG say on who should stay or go. After all, the show itself is airing what are the comments of each mentor to each survivor to each challenge, which also are indicative of who amongst them are safe and not. And more than anything else, it is our pennies that we spend for the millions of text votes were giving these star-wanna-bes.


I honestly think that the credibility of some reality shows here in the Philippines is getting questionable. But it was more disappointing to know that the pioneer of this kind of shows here in the Philippines have been tainted as well of this kind of dirty tactics. Calling people from Starstruck 5, prove me wrong!


Ooh by the way, Rocco Nacino is my sure winner. If he won’t win, then I wouldn’t know what to say anymore.

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Mine was Generation X...

My dad, Ejay, I and my 5-year old nephew were all busy watching Starstruck 5 when all of a sudden the nephew jumped out of the sofa and said he wanted to stop watching and just go home (they live on the second floor of our two-storey abode). Today’s episode of Starstruck was the survivors’ Kiss Flick where they were challenged to do their first on-screen kiss. Our confused faces forced him to reason, “Kasi tumitigas ang t%*i ko eh.” (Because I’m having a turn on).

Oh my God! What’s happening to these kids’ generation? Now I understand why the alphabet is no longer enough to spell theirs. I never knew that kids his age can now be affected by simple and plain screen kissing!

Must I lend him the DVD copy of the American Pie movies I am now marathon-ing? Whatchathink readers?

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

A tactic not good...

Testing issues could derail Mayweather-Pacquiao

By Kevin Iole, Yahoo! Sports

Nearly every detail is finalized for Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Manny Pacquiao to fight on March 13 at the MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas but one. That one detail, though, may kill the fight.

Negotiations are at an impasse over Pacquiao’s failure to agree to random Olympic-style drug testing, said Leonard Ellerbe, the CEO of Mayweather Promotions, on Tuesday.
Pacquiao trainer Freddie Roach said his fighter is willing to comply with strict drug-testing standards, but Roach won’t allow.

Ellerbe said he would not let Mayweather enter the ring unless Pacquiao agreed to it.
Both sides agreed that the drug testing issue is the only hurdle preventing the fight from being finished. Earlier Tuesday, Golden Boy Promotions officially requested March 13 from the Nevada State Athletic Commission to host the show.

“As Floyd’s management, we are insistent that there be a level playing field,” Ellerbe said. “This is in the best interests of the fighters, the fans and the sport. If you want a level playing field, the best way to do it is to have Olympic-style, random drug testing administered by the premier agency in the world, the [United States Anti-Doping Agency].”

Pacquiao promoter Bob Arum said the demand is “absolutely crazy,” done simply to harass Pacquiao, who is squeamish about needles, and is proof that Mayweather doesn’t really want the fight.

Arum said the request has been an unsettled issue since the first day of negotiations last month.
“We’re not going to agree to have Manny give blood in training, because that’s stupid,” Arum said. “Every doctor in the world will tell you that is stupid. He’ll give his blood at the beginning of the year and he’s willing to be urine-tested 24/7, but blood doesn’t show [expletive] and he’s not going to do it.”

In a statement released by his publicist, Mayweather said he is willing to submit to the testing. There was never any suspicion that Pacquiao had ever taken banned substances until earlier this year, when Floyd Mayweather Sr. suggested he was on steroids.

Pacquiao has passed every urine test he’s been given in connection with boxing matches.
“I understand Pacquiao not liking having his blood taken, because frankly I don’t know anyone who really does,” Mayweather said in his statement. “But in a fight of this magnitude, I think it is our responsibility to subject ourselves to sportsmanship at the highest level. I have already agreed to the testing and it is a shame that he is not willing to do the same.
“It leaves me with great doubt as to the level of fairness I would be facing in the ring that night. I hope that this is either some miscommunication or that Manny will change his mind and step up and allow these tests, which were good enough for all these other great athletes, to be performed by USADA.”

Blood tests for illegal drugs and banned substances are not required by the Nevada State Athletic Commission, which would have regulatory control of the bout if it is held in Las Vegas.
In Nevada, a fighter is required to submit to a blood test that screens for HIV and Hepatitis B and C, as well as other blood-borne diseases, as part of the requirement to gain a license.
A license in Nevada is good for one year. In Pacquiao’s case, he received his 2009 license shortly before he fought Ricky Hatton in May. He submitted his blood to the commission between April 5 and April 20, said Keith Kizer, the commission’s executive director.

Kizer said all fighters who fight in Nevada are subject to random urine tests as well as any other medical tests, such as an MRI or a CAT scan, that the commission deems necessary. Arum said Pacquiao is willing to submit to testing by an outside agency but won’t give his blood. Roach said it’s an issue because Mayweather’s side has been insisting Pacquiao give blood as close as 48 hours within the fight.

“We’ll accommodate their requests and do urine testing up the wazoo and we’ll agree to have them done by an outside agency,” Arum said. “Manny has nothing to hide. But he’s not going to give blood because that’s crazy. He’ll do it at the beginning and he’ll do it at the end. That’s how it is done. Ask some former Olympic boxers how many times they give blood.”
Ellerbe said having the testing administered by USADA would quell suspicions about the procedures or the result.

“This is no rooty toot organization,” said Ellerbe, who noted that such testing was accepted by elite athletes such as LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Michael Phelps and Lance Armstrong.
Roach scoffed at such talk and said it won’t matter to him if the fight is not held.
“I really don’t care, because Manny doesn’t need Floyd Mayweather,” Roach said. “The tests he’s requesting are not commission tests, they’re not boxing tests and this is not an Olympic sport. A urine test is just as qualified as a blood test. [Human growth hormone] is not detected by blood or urine.”

The World Anti-Doping Agency successfully used blood testing at the 2004 Olympics in Athens to test for HGH.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Soon...

I'll be signing in again... Hope you missed my writings!

But just the same, I can't promise to be good. I'll still be the biatch that I am!